Aristotelian pre-Socratics, A glance at Aristotle's Narrative from pre-Socratics

Metaphysics (University of Isfahan) 6 (18):17-32 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, it's tried to study Aristotle's narrative of pre-Socratics on the base of Aristotle's texts and mainly using metaphysics, physics, genesis and decadence books. It is also tried to show how Aristotle has interpreted all the pre-Socratics in one way and on the base of his own philosophy framework. He interprets pre-Socratic Arche as an element that means comprehensive matter which is nothing itself, but everything is combination of it and even considers that as substance and the other things as accident. He interprets the distinction of Arche and other things on the basis of this contrast in his philosophy. Aristotle, also analyzes pre-Socratics' viewpoint to change on the base of his distinction among change, genesis and corruption. All these cases show that Aristotle has interpreted the pre-Socratics on the basis of his thought, as Aristotelians. On this basis, since Aristotle's thoughts are the first and the most important sources of pre-Socratic philosophy, Aristotle's role should be considered in studies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thoughts Of Socratics In The Contemporary Interpretations. [REVIEW]Artur Pacewicz - 2011 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 6 (4):197-200.
20 Anaxagoras and the Concept of Matter Before Aristotle.G. B. Kerferd - 1974 - In Alexander P. D. Mourelatos (ed.), The pre-Socratics: a collection of critical essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. pp. 489-503.
Aletheia in Greek thought until Aristotle.Jan Woleński - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 127 (1-3):339-360.
The pre-Socratics: a collection of critical essays.Alexander P. D. Mourelatos (ed.) - 1974 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
The Place and Status of Psychology According to Aristotle and Avicenna.SeyyedAhmad Hosseini - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 12 (22):29-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-08

Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mehdi Safari
University of Tehran
Mohammad Bagher Ghomi
University of Tehran

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references