Philosophical Forum 42 (1):61-78 (2011)

Carl Sachs
Marymount University
I examine John McDowell's attitude towards naturalism in general, and evolutionary theory in particular, by distinguishing between "transcendental descriptions" and "empirical explanations". With this distinction in view we can understand why McDowell holds that there is both continuity and discontinuity between humans qua rational animals and other animals -- there is continuity with regards to empirical explanations and discontinuity with regards to transcendental descriptions. The result of this examination is a clearer assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of McDowell's contribution to philosophical naturalism.
Keywords McDowell  transcendental philosophy  naturalism  rational animal  Dewey  evolution
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9191.2011.00378.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Notion of Sensation in Sellars' Theory of Perception.Luca Corti - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):1079-1099.
Consequences of Behaviorism: Sellars and de Laguna on Explanation.Peter Olen - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (2):111-131.
Between Causes and Reasons: Sellars, Hegel (and Lewis) on “Sensation”.Luca Corti - 2019 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (3):422-447.
Causality in the McDowellian World.Alan Charles McKay - 2014 - Dissertation, Queen's University Belfast

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Resisting the Disenchantment of Nature: McDowell and the Question of Animal Minds.Carl B. Sachs - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (2):131-147.
McDowell, Transcendental Philosophy, and Naturalism.Adrian Haddock - 2009 - Philosophical Topics 37 (1):63-75.
Three Sorts of Naturalism.Hans Fink - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):202–221.
The Transcendental Nature of Mind and World.Bryan Baird - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):381-398.
McDowell's Naturalism.Jan Almäng - 2006 - In Björn Haglund & Helge Malmgren (eds.), Kvantifikator för en Dag. Essays Dedicated to Dag Westerståhl on his Sixtieth Birthday. Philosophical Communications.
Kant and Naturalism Reconsidered.John H. Zammito - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (5):532 – 558.
Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism.Joel Smith & Peter Sullivan (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Husserl’s Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism.Dermot Moran - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):401-425.
McDowell, Phenomenology and the Awareness of the World.Donnchadh O'Conaill - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):499-518.


Added to PP index

Total views
69 ( #166,375 of 2,506,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #90,541 of 2,506,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes