Ekman's basic emotions: Why not love and jealousy?

Cognition and Emotion 19 (5):693-712 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Paul Ekman's view of the emotions is, we argue, pervasive in psychology and is explicitly shaped to be compatible with evolutionary thinking. Yet, strangely, jealousy and parental love, two emotions that figure prominently in evolutionary psychology, are absent from Ekman's list of the emotions. In this paper we examine why Ekman believes this exclusion is necessary, and what this implies about the limits of his conception of emotion. We propose an alternative way of thinking about emotion that does not exclude jealousy and parental love.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An argument for basic emotions.Paul Ekman - 1992 - Cognition and Emotion 6 (3):169-200.
Basic emotions.Paul Ekman - 1999 - In Tim Dalgleish & M. J. Powers (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley. pp. 4--5.
Basic Emotions, Complex Emotions, Machiavellian Emotions.Paul E. Griffiths - 2003 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 52:39-67.
Gender and jealousy: Stories of infidelity.John Sabini & Maury Silver - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (5):713-727.
Are envy, anger, and resentment moral emotions?Aaron Ben-Ze'ev - 2002 - Philosophical Explorations 5 (2):148 – 154.
Jealousy in relation to envy.Luke Purshouse - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (2):179-205.
Basic Emotion Questions.Robert W. Levenson - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (4):379-386.
Basic Emotions or Ur-Emotions?Nico H. Frijda & W. Gerrod Parrott - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (4):406-415.
Self Love.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:129-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
93 (#181,115)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?