A Libertarian Perspective on Peace Enforcement by the United Nations

Studia Humana 9 (2):75-82 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most analysts view the United Nations as a positive stabilising force in international affairs. In this paper, I critically assess this opinion of the UN’s peace enforcement actions using the case studies of the Korean War and the Gulf War while relying on the non-aggression axiom of libertarian philosophy. In the process, I shed light on some of the moral considerations at play when deciding on UN-sanctioned military intervention.

Similar books and articles

The New Interventionism.Michael W. Doyle - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (1-2):212-235.
The UN's Roles in International Relations.Adam Roberts & Benedict Kingsbury - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:8-15.
The Future of Human Rights: A View from the United Nations.Andrew Gilmour - 2014 - Ethics and International Affairs 28 (2):239-250.
Japan and UN Peace Operations.Katsumi Ishizuka - 2004 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 5 (1):137-157.
The United Nations and the Bible.Jason Tatlock - 2012 - Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 22 (2):49-72.
Introduction.Joy Gordon - 2019 - Ethics and International Affairs 33 (3):275-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-25

Downloads
808 (#17,827)

6 months
68 (#61,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sukrit Sabhlok
Macquarie University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references