On the logic of perception sentences

Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (1-2):72-76 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I discuss perception sentences of the following there syn- tactic types: John saw Mary John saw Mary run John saw that Mary run Our aim is to present an interpretation of Hintikka's logic of perception, extend it to case and dened the approach against the cirticism levelled against it by Jon Barwise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the logic of perception sentences.Esa Saarinen - 1983 - Synthese 54 (1):115 - 128.
Perception and Animal Belief.L. S. Carrier - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (212):193 - 209.
Identificational Sentences.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (1):43-77.
The logical form of perception sentences.John Bacon - 1979 - Synthese 41 (2):271 - 308.
Development of logical form.Andrej Ule - 1991 - Filozofski Vestnik 12 (1):215-224.
Kant on Existential Import.Alberto Vanzo - 2014 - Kantian Review 19 (2):207-232.
The Modal Logic of Gödel Sentences.Hirohiko Kushida - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):577 - 590.
Is a logic for belief sentences possible?Karen Green - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (1):29 - 55.
A Remark on Henkin Sentences and Their Contraries.John P. Burgess - 2003 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (3):185-188.
Polyadic and cylindric algebras of sentences.Mohamed Amer & Tarek Ahmed - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):444-449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-23

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references