Is free will a process or a content: Both? Neither? Are we free to take a position on this question?

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):62-72 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Comments on the views on free will offered by B. D. Slife , M. Gergen , R. N. Williams , M. S. Richardson , and G. S. Howard in light of the classical definition of FW as being capable of doing otherwise. It is argued that FW interpretations differ markedly depending on whether they are viewed as due to a process or to contents within some process. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kane, luck, and the significance of free will.Alfred R. Mele - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):96-104.
Free will: From nature to illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):71-95.
Free WIll.Kevin Timpe - 2012 - In Neil Manson & Bob Barnard (eds.), Continuum Companion to Metaphysics. London: Continuum. pp. 223-243.
Free Will.Saul Smilansky - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2:143-152.
The religious adequacy of free-will theism.David M. Ciocchi - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (1):45-61.
Libet and the case for free will scepticism.Tim Bayne - 2011 - In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Free Will and Modern Science. Oup/British Academy.
Free will.Kevin Timpe - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references