Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts

Criminal Justice Ethics 40 (1):56-67 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A traditional assumption in retributivist thinking is the view that an offender's desert is determined exclusively on the basis of the gravity of the crime committed. However, this assumption has r...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/0731129x.2021.1900649

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Desert of What? On Murphy’s Reluctant Retributivism.Linda Radzik - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):161-173.
Retributivism, Penal Censure, and Life Imprisonment without Parole.Netanel Dagan & Julian V. Roberts - 2019 - Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (1):1-18.
Making more sense of retributivism: Desert as responsibility and proportionality.J. Angelo Corlett - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (2):279-287.
Moral Responsibility, Guilt, and Retributivism.Randolph Clarke - 2016 - The Journal of Ethics 20 (1-3):121-137.
Retributivism and Public Opinion: On the Context Sensitivity of Desert.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (1):125-142.
Rehabilitating Retributivism.Mitchell N. Berman - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):83-108.
The Justification of Deserved Punishment Via General Moral Principles.Stephen Kershnar - 1995 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):461-484.
The fitting, the deserving, and the beautiful.Leo Zaibert - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):331-350.
Two Claims About Desert.Nathan Hanna - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):41-56.
Multilateral Retributivism: Justifying Change.Richard R. Eva - 2015 - Stance 8 (1):65-70.
Moral Desert: A Critique.Howard Simmons - 2010 - Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Book Review: Retributivism Has a Past: Has It a Future?, edited by Michael Tonry. [REVIEW]Stephen Kershnar - 2015 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (1):112-115.
Retributivism and the proportionality dilemma.Jesper Ryberg - 2020 - Ratio 34 (2):158-166.
Making sense of retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Justice without Retribution: An Epistemic Argument against Retributive Criminal Punishment.Gregg D. Caruso - 2018 - Neuroethics 13 (1):13-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-12

Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Do Criminal Offenders Have a Right to Neurorehabilitation?Emma Dore-Horgan - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (2):429-451.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Censure and Sanctions.Andrew Von Hirsch - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (4):407-415.
Crime, Guilt and Punishment.Chin Liew Ten - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (4):522-522.

Add more references