The Standard Objection to the Standard Account

Philosophical Studies 111 (3):197 - 216 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the relation between a clay statue andthe lump of clay from which it is made? According to the defender of the standardaccount, the statue and the lump are distinct,enduring objects that share the same spatiallocation whenever they both exist. Suchobjects also seem to share the samemicrophysical structure whenever they bothexist. This leads to the standard objection tothe standard account: if the statue and thelump of clay have the same microphysicalstructure whenever they both exist, how canthey differ in their de re temporalproperties, de re modal properties and soon? In this paper I develop amereological answer to this question – thestatue and the lump differ with respect totheir parts and this explains theirdifference with respect to de re temporalproperties, de re modal properties andthe like.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

World poverty, positive duties, and the overdemandingness objection.Jorn Sonderholm - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):308-327.
Free will and the problem of evil.James Cain - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):437-456.
Reliabilism 'naturalized'.Steven Miller & Marcel Fredericks - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (4):367 – 376.
External justifications and institutional roles.A. John Simmons - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (1):28-36.
Desire fulfillment and posthumous harm.Douglas W. Portmore - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):27 - 38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
194 (#99,089)

6 months
22 (#118,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ryan Wasserman
Western Washington University

Citations of this work

Parthood.Theodore Sider - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (1):51-91.
Ordinary objects.Daniel Z. Korman - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Getting priority straight.Louis deRosset - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (1):73-97.
Identity and Indiscernibility.K. Hawley - 2009 - Mind 118 (469):101-119.
Composition.Daniel Z. Korman & Chad Carmichael - 2016 - Oxford Handbooks Online.

View all 43 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Four Dimensionalism.Theodore Sider - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time.Theodore Sider - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):642-647.

View all 26 references / Add more references