Elena Ruíz
Michigan State University
Ezgi Sertler
Utah Valley University
A credible fear test is an in-depth interview process given to undocumented people of any age arriving at a U.S. port of entry to determine qualification for asylum-seeking. Credible fear tests as a typical immigration procedure demonstrate not only what structural epistemic violence looks like but also how this violence lives in and through the design of asylum policy. Key terms of credible fear tests such as “significant possibility,” “evidence,” “consistency,” and “credibility” can never be neutral in the context of colonial administrative violence. We argue that these terms function as mechanisms of exclusion and demonstrate that the capacity to be violent (i.e. to be an instrument of violence) is built into these tests, ready to be deployed when an administration wants to stop certain people from certain places from entering without regard to their own ongoing occupation of Indigenous lands. Not only are such practices instruments of violence, but the concept of ‘violence’ continues to be organized, defined, and conceived within settler colonial epistemologies so as to exclude these administrative forms of violence deployed against Indigenous peoples and people of color from recognition and nameability. We argue that this is an intentional strategy of colonial power preservation that is functionalized through social processes that remain structurally stable and self-regenerating across historical and political changes.
Keywords colonialism  colonial violence  epistemic violence  settler epistemologies  asylum  gender-based violence  immigration  credible fear test  refugees
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Encountering Asylum Seekers: An Ethic of Fear or Faith?Susanna Snyder - 2011 - Studies in Christian Ethics 24 (3):350-366.
Not Our Kind of Hate Crime.Gail Mason - 2001 - Law and Critique 12 (3):253-278.
Fanon, Sartre, Violence, and Freedom.Neil Roberts - 2004 - Sartre Studies International 10 (2):139-160.
Fanon, Sartre, Violence, and Freedom.Neil Roberts - 2004 - Sartre Studies International 10:139-160.
Frantz Fanon.Pramod K. Nayar - 2012 - Routledge.
Fear and Hope: Author’s Response.Gail Mason - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (2):196-206.
Protecting One’s Commitments: Integrity and Self-Defense.Sylvia Burrow - 2012 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):49-66.
Women and Asylum: A Particular Social Group. [REVIEW]Sue Kirvan - 1999 - Feminist Legal Studies 7 (3):333-342.


Added to PP index

Total views
231 ( #47,661 of 2,499,406 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #17,926 of 2,499,406 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes