Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Expanding Access to Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation: An Analysis by Analogy”

, , &
American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):W9-W9 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2013.781363

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Expanding Access to Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation: An Analysis by Analogy.Tuua Ruutiainen, Steve Miller, Arthur Caplan & Jill P. Ginsberg - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):28-35.
An Additional Consideration Regarding Expanding Access to Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation: Infertility and Social Stigma.Allison Marziliano & Anne Moyer - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):48 - 50.
Applying the Experience of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation to Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation: What the Girls Have Taught Us.Sigal Klipstein & Mary E. Fallat - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics: 13 (3):44 - 46.
Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation: Combining Access With Safeguards.Heidi Mertes & Guido Pennings - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):46 - 48.
Offering Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation to Boys: The Increasing Importance of Biological Fatherhood.Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics: 13 (3):39 - 40.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Decisional Analysis of Consent”.Jonathan Baron - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):W51-W53.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Analogical Reasoning in Handling Emerging Technologies: The Case of Umbilical Cord Blood Biobanking”: Analogy is Like Air—Invisible and Indispensable.Bjørn Hofmann, Søren Holm & Jan Helge Solbakk - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W13-W14.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate”.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):W1 - W3.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
The Right to Know Your Genetic Parents: From Open-Identity Gamete Donation to Routine Paternity Testing.An Ravelingien & Guido Pennings - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):33-41.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Coming Era of Nanomedicine”.Fritz Allhoff - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):1-2.
Genetic Enhancement Revisited: Response to Open Peer Commentaries.Ruiping Fan - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):6-8.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Broader View of Justice”.Nancy S. Jecker - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):1-2.
Preserving Testicular Tissue and a Boy's Open Reproductive Future.Valerie B. Satkoske & Lisa S. Parker - 2013 - TThe American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):36 - 37.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “An Open Letter to Institutional Review Boards Considering Northfield Laboratories' PolyHeme® Trial ”: The Emergency Exception and Unproven/Unsatisfactory Treatment.Ken Kipnis, Nancy M. P. King & Robert M. Nelson - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):W49-W50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-26

Downloads
21 (#676,185)

6 months
2 (#1,015,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arthur L. Caplan
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 7 references / Add more references