Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):772-789 (2008)
Abstract |
Obesity is widely recognized as a preventable cause of death and disease. Reducing obesity among adults and children has become a national health goal in the United States. As one approach to the obesity epidemic, public health practitioners and others have asserted the need to provide consumers with information about the foods they eat. Some state and local governments across the United States have introduced menu labeling bills and regulations that require restaurants to post information, such as calorie content, for foods offered on their menus or menu boards. A major dilemma is whether state and local menu labeling laws are preempted by the federal Nutrition Labeling and Education Act . While few courts have addressed this issue, ongoing litigation in New York City provides an early glimpse of judicial interpretation in this area. This article explores these preemption issues, arguing that appropriately written and implemented menu labeling laws should not be preempted by the NLEA. We offer guidance for states and localities that wish to develop and implement menu labeling laws
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00337.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Local Venues for Change: Legal Strategies for Healthy Environments.Marice Ashe, Lisa M. Feldstein, Samantha Graff, Randolph Kline, Debora Pinkas & Leslie Zellers - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):138-147.
Local Venues for Change: Legal Strategies for Healthy Environments.Marice Ashe, Lisa M. Feldstein, Samantha Graff, Randolph Kline, Debora Pinkas & Leslie Zellers - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):138-147.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Respecting the Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods.Alan Rubel & Robert Streiffer - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):75-84.
A Liberal Approach to the Obesity Epidemic.Alex Rajczi - 2008 - Public Affairs Quarterly 22 (3):269-288.
Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate.Paul Weirich (ed.) - 2007 - Oup Usa.
Labeling Products of Biotechnology: Towards Communication and Consent.Debra Jackson - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (3):319-330.
The Obesity Epidemic: Medical and Ethical Considerations. [REVIEW]Jantina de Vries - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):55-67.
The Non-Viability of State Regulation of Workplace Captive Audience Meetings: A Response to Professor Secunda.Kye D. Pawlenko - unknown
Public Health and Obesity: When a Pound of Prevention Really Is Worth an Ounce of Cure.C. A. Womack - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (3):222-228.
Consumer Autonomy and Sufficiency of Gmf Labeling.Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):353-369.
Does Autonomy Count in Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food?Kirsten Hansen - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
Obesity: Towards a System of Libertarian Paternalistic Public Health Interventions.R. A. Skipper - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (2):181-191.
Food, Consumer Concerns, and Trust: Food Ethics for a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW]Frans W. A. Brom - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):127-139.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-13
Total views
6 ( #1,138,022 of 2,520,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,438 of 2,520,856 )
2010-09-13
Total views
6 ( #1,138,022 of 2,520,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,438 of 2,520,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads