Environmental Ethics 3 (2):101-112 (1981)

Abstract
One seldom-noted consequence of most recent arguments for “animal rights” or against “speciesism” is their inability to provide a justification for differential treatment on the basis of species membership, even in cases of rare or endangered species. I defend the claim that arguments about the moral status of individual animals inadequately deal with this issue, and go on, with the help of several test cases, to reject three traditional analyses of our alleged obligation to protect endangered species. I conclude that these traditional analyses fail, that there is an important conceptual confusion in any attempt to ascribe value to a species, and that our obligation must ultimately rest on the value---often aesthetic-of individual members of certain species.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI enviroethics19813248
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Environmental Diversity and the Value of the Unusual.Jason Kawall - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 22:21-26.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Do Species Matter?Lilly-Marlene Russow - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (2):101-112.
Buddhism and the Ethics of Species Conservation.Simon P. James - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (1):85 - 97.
Who Loves Mosquitoes? Care Ethics, Theory of Obligation and Endangered Species.Eleni Panagiotarakou - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (6):1057-1070.
Species as a Relationship.Julia Tanner - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (4):337-347.
Biodiversity and All That Jazz.Alan Carter - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):58-75.
Biodiversity and All That Jazz.Alan Carter - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):58-75.
Species Equality and the Foundations of Moral Theory.James C. Anderson - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):347 - 365.
On the Metaphysics of Species.Judith K. Crane - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (2):156-173.
Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism.Ingo Brigandt - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305–1316.
Species Inegalitarianism as a Matter of Principle.Christopher Knapp - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):174-189.
Triage as a Species Preservation Strategy.David H. Bennett - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (1):47-58.
Why Should We Care About Rare Species?Alastair S. Gunn - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (1):17-37.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
83 ( #139,843 of 2,505,161 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #45,651 of 2,505,161 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes