The Industry Take-Over of Home Birth and Death

Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (3):289-290 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The generation in the United States who renewed interest in home birth is also returning to the tradition of funeral care at home. Caring for your own dead at home is legal in all 50 U.S. states.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problematic symmetry between brain birth and brain death.D. G. Jones - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):237-242.
The grey zones of birth and death.Sholom Glouberman - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (2):394-399.
Jthe birth of difference.Christina Schües - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (2):243-252.
The hospitalisation of death: should more people die at home?A. Bowling - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (3):158-161.
Natality and mortality: rethinking death with Cavarero.Alison Stone - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):353-372.
The home birth movement in the united states.Bonnie B. O'Connor - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (2):147-174.
Category mistakes in m&e.Gilbert Harman - 2003 - Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):165–180.
Brain birth and personal identity.D. G. Jones - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4):173-185.
Death as an Industry.Zygmunt Bauman - 1998 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1998 (113):150-156.
Defining reducible risk.Sheryl Burt Ruzek - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (4):383-408.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-13

Downloads
10 (#1,155,084)

6 months
4 (#797,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references