The Controversy between Niklas Luhmann and Jűrgen Habermas Related to Sociological Approach to Law

Seeu Review 16 (1):3-13 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present a brief insight into the significant works and views of the German sociologists Niklas Luhmann and Jűrgen Habermas on the role of law in regulating human relations in society. Educated as a lawyer, Niklas Luhmann in the late academic career was under the influence of the American sociologist Talcott Parsons. Niklas Luhmann later, under the influence of the American sociologist Talcott Parsons, he built a sociological theoretical system called the systems theory. On the other side, Jűrgen Habermas was a philosopher and sociologist, highly influenced by the Frankfurt school of sociology. According to Luhmann‘s systems theory, the social reality and the separate aspects of the social life are part of a deeper system called society, and in relation to the same they are set as subsystems. Social systems are divided into allopoietic and autopoietic. One of the significant axioms of Luhmann’s theory is that the largest number of systems tends to simplify due to the pressure of the environment for greater efficiency. Law in Luhman’s systems theory enjoys the status of an autonomous system for regulating society, rather than an instrumental contribution to politics. This brief review exposed a big clash between two influential German thinkers. In this paper we are going to use historical method and analysing of the content of different materials and previous authors that are dealing with the work of Niklas Luhmann and Jűrgen Habermas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Art as a Social System: The Sociological Aesthetics of Niklas Luhmann.Matthew Rampley - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (148):111-140.
Law as a Social System.Niklas Luhmann (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Autopoietic System.Jan Overwijk - 2019 - Philosophy Today 63 (4):1125-1137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-13

Downloads
21 (#695,936)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tod des Subjekts?Herta Nagl-Docekal & Helmuth Vetter (eds.) - 1987 - Wien: R. Oldenbourg.
Tod des Subjekts?Herta Nagl-Docekal & Helmuth Vetter - 1989 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 43 (2):390-393.

Add more references