In defence of Hume’s law

In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Is and Ought. Palgrave MacMillan (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An argument defending the view that one cannot derive an ought from an is against the usual (suspect) counterexamples.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
180 (#105,506)

6 months
22 (#118,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gillian Russell
Australian Catholic University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references