Evolutionary Naturalism [Book Review]

Mind 108 (430):401-405 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science Evolving. [REVIEW]Ray Scott Percival - 1995 - Nature 376 (6536):131-132.
Evolutionary naturalism.Michael Ruse - 2003 - In A. J. Sanford & P. N. Johnson-Laird (eds.), Mind. T & T Clark. pp. 401-405.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
What’s wrong with the evolutionary argument against naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
Back to Roy wood Sellars: Why his evolutionary naturalism is still worthwhile.Pouwel Slurink - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3):425-449.
The Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (1):78-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
7 (#1,351,854)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick Agar
Victoria University of Wellington

Citations of this work

Critical notice.Christopher di Carlo - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (1):117-130.
Progress in nature and culture. [REVIEW]Jitse M. van der Meer - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (5):759-772.
Agar's review of Katz. [REVIEW]Nicholas Agar - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (1):123-139.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references