Interpretation:1-50 (forthcoming)
Abstract |
To avoid steep declines in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale production, wells are fracture-stimulated to release the hydrocarbons trapped in the matrix of the formation. An accurate estimation of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio is essential for hydraulic fracture propagation. In addition, ignoring the highly heterogeneous and anisotropic character of the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale can lead to erroneous stress values, which subsequently affect hydraulic fracture width estimates and the overall hydraulic fracturing process. An empirical 1D geomechanical model which takes into account VTI anisotropy is developed and used to characterize the elastic mechanical properties of the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale in two wells. In the analyzed formation, vertical Poisson’s ratio is less than the horizontal Poisson’s ratio, which suggests the necessity of an alternative to the ANNIE equations. The stiffness coefficients C13 and C11 were estimated using the relationships developed from the ultrasonic core data available for the two Tuscaloosa Marine Shale wells. Further, correlations between the static and dynamic properties from laboratory tests were used to improve minimum horizontal stress calculation. The paper compares VTI Young’s moduli, Poisson’s ratios and minimum horizontal stress with the isotropic solution. VTI modeling improves the estimation of the elastic mechanical properties. The isotropic solution underestimates the minimum horizontal stress in the formation. Moreover, it was shown that the 20-foot shale interval below the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale base is characterized by a low Young’s modulus and may be a frac barrier.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1190/int-2019-0269.1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Machine Learning for Geophysical Characterization of Brittleness: Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Case Study.Mark Mlella, Ming Ma, Rui Zhang & Mehdi Mokhtari - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (3):T589-T597.
Experimental Evaluation of Ultrasonic Velocities and Anisotropy in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Formation.Jamal Ahmadov & Mehdi Mokhtari - forthcoming - Interpretation:1-62.
Geomechanical Analysis of Microseismicity in an Organic Shale: A West Virginia Marcellus Shale Example.Erich Zorn, Abhash Kumar, William Harbert & Richard Hammack - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (1):T231-T239.
Anisotropic Strength and Failure Behaviors of Transversely Isotropic Shales: An Experimental Investigation.Yang Wang, Hui Li, Abhijit Mitra, De-Hua Han & Teng Long - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (3):SL59-SL70.
Integrated Reservoir Characterization of a Utica Shale with Focus on Sweet Spot Discrimination.Jinming Zhu - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (3):SM1-SM14.
Replacing Conventional Brittleness Indices Determination with New Attributes Using True Hydrofracturing Mechanism.Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Satinder Chopra & Larry R. Lines - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (4):T1081-T1095.
Influencing Factor Analysis of the Elastic Properties of Shale with Rock-Physical Model Including Pressure Effects.Zhaoyun Zong, Man Jiang & Miaomiao Xu - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (3):T515-T524.
Methodology and Application of Shale-Reservoir Natural Fracture Modeling Based on Microseismic Monitoring Data.Ziwei Liu, Jiapeng Wu, Wenzhong Han, Yonggui Zhang, Zhenyong Li, Yuehua Ma, Kecong Ma, Yao Zhang & Hu Wang - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (4):SP167-SP174.
Fracability Evaluation of Lacustrine Shale by Integrating Brittleness and Fracture Toughness.Cheng Huang, Chao Yang & Feng Shen - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (2):T363-T372.
Seismic Reconstruction of the in Situ Anisotropic Stress Field for Caprock Integrity in the Athabasca Oil-Sands Basin, Canada.Draga A. Talinga & Carmen C. Dumitrescu - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (1):T221-T229.
Geologic and Geochemical Characteristics of the Cambrian Marine Shale in the Tarim Basin of China and Their Implication for the Prediction of Shale-Gas Resources.Jinqi Qiao, Luofu Liu, Baojian Shen & Xiaoqing Shang - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (3):T657-T669.
Characterization of a Shale-Gas Reservoir Based on a Seismic AVO Inversion for VTI Media and Quantitative Seismic Interpretation.Feng Zhang, Lin Wang & Xiang-Yang Li - forthcoming - Interpretation:1-40.
Quantitative Identification of Microfractures in the Marine Shale Reservoir of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation Using Water Immersion Tests and Image Characterization.Hu Wang, Zhiliang He, Yonggui Zhang, Kun Su & Ruyue Wang - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (4):SN23-SN30.
Geologic Characterization of a Lower Cambrian Marine Shale: Implications for Shale Gas Potential in Northwestern Hunan, South China.Zhenghui Xiao, Jisong Liu, Jingqiang Tan, Rongfeng Yang, Jason Hilton, Ping Zhou, Zhaohui Wang & Yunjiang Cao - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (3):T635-T647.
Fracture Behavior of Longmaxi Shale with Implications for Subsurface Applications.Zonghu Liao, Shunjie Deng, Xiaofeng Chen, Mengni Wu, Yongshang Kang, Lianbo Zeng & Huayao Zou - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (4):SP205-SP213.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-08-13
Total views
5 ( #1,198,949 of 2,498,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,778 )
2020-08-13
Total views
5 ( #1,198,949 of 2,498,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,778 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads