Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands

Minerva 53 (2):117-139 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The range and types of performance metrics has recently proliferated in academic settings, with bibliometric indicators being particularly visible examples. One field that has traditionally been hospitable towards such indicators is biomedicine. Here the relative merits of bibliometrics are widely discussed, with debates often portraying them as heroes or villains. Despite a plethora of controversies, one of the most widely used indicators in this field is said to be the Journal Impact Factor. In this article we argue that much of the current debates around researchers’ uses of the JIF in biomedicine can be classed as ‘folk theories’: explanatory accounts told among a community that seldom get systematically checked. Such accounts rarely disclose how knowledge production itself becomes more-or-less consolidated around the JIF. Using ethnographic materials from different research sites in Dutch University Medical Centers, this article sheds new empirical and theoretical light on how performance metrics variously shape biomedical research on the ‘shop floor.’ Our detailed analysis underscores a need for further research into the constitutive effects of evaluative metrics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings.Stevan Harnad - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):103-107.
Use and misuse of metrics in research evaluation.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):109-120.
The Impact Factor Fallacy.Frieder M. Paulus, Nicole Cruz & Sören Krach - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:324900.
Social Media Metrics for New Research Evaluation.Paul Wouters, Zohreh Zahedi & Rodrigo Costas - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 687-713.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-31

Downloads
46 (#341,877)

6 months
16 (#219,437)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?