A Defense of Ideal Liberalism

Dissertation, Cornell University (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dissertation defends a teleological liberal normative theory against the most prominent contributions to contemporary liberal thought, specifically the deontological liberalism of John Rawls and those who have followed in the spirit of his work. The teleological theory that is advanced incorporates an objective conception of value; hence, the reference to "ideal" liberalism to designate the position that is defended. ;Ideal teleological theories have had a prominent place in modern liberal thought in the works of T. H. Green, the new liberals, and others , although as a result of the impact of Rawls's work such positions have not recently received much attention and doubts have been raised about their capacity to satisfy liberal commitments to tolerance, anti-paternalism, and liberty. The dissertation defends the liberal credentials of ideal liberalism while arguing it is in a better position to respond to some of the more forceful criticisms of contemporary Rawlsian liberalism. In particular, the dissertation argues that contemporary liberalism's commitment to a resourcist conception of value, or to "liberal neutrality," cannot be sustained against criticisms about the fairness of this account of value to certain non-individualistic ways of life and against criticisms about its capacity to ensure a stable, progressive social environment. These criticisms point to the need to adopt a neo-Aristotelian conception of value as the basis of a liberal normative theory. It is also argued that a liberal theory that is based in such a conception of value is better able than its main competitor to address issues related to justice, gender, and culture. A chapter is also devoted to restoring a traditional liberal commitment to liberty as a predominant value in liberal theory by defending a normative conception of liberty in response to contemporary liberal skepticism that there is an important role for liberty in normative moral or political theory. Although the dissertation is not an exercise in the history of ideas, it draws importantly on the work of earlier ideal liberals such as J. S. Mill, T. H. Green, L. T. Hobhouse, and J. A. Hobson.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberal neutrality or liberal tolerance?Colin M. Macleod - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529 - 559.
Contemporary Conceptions of Liberalism.Carol Anne Mele - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
Liberty and Improvement: Rethinking Mill's Liberalism.Weihe Huang - 1993 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Justice, Liberalism, and Responsibility.Steven Paul Scalet - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Rawls' Kantian ideal and the viability of modern liberalism.Gerald Doppelt - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (4):413 – 449.
Justice, Care, and Gender: Feminist Critiques of Liberal Political Theory.Mitchell Edwin Avila - 1993 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Taking Pluralism Seriously.Evan Charney - 2000 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Mills liberalism and liberalism's posterity.John Gray - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):137-165.
Liberal Defense of Rawls and Kymlicka Against the Communitarian Critique.Hahn Suhl - 1998 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Russell
Langara College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references