International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321 (1995)
AbstractAbstract Kierkegaard and his pseudonym, Johannes Climacus, advance a ?theory? of indirect communication which designates it as the appropriate vehicle for ethico?religious discourse. This paper examines the justification for this claim, as it is elaborated in the Postscript, and traces the similarity between Climacus? account of indirect communication and his broader existential ethics. Both accounts locate the identity of the subject in the repeated renunciation of finitude. Just as the autonomy of the Kantian subject demands indifference to phenomenal incentives, so too the ?infinite possibility? of the Climacean subject is assured only through its repeated renunciation of finite determinants. The paper argues that this project of self?determination underlies both the theory of indirect communication and the Postscript's existential ethics, and both are critiqued by Kierkegaard under the rubric of ?Religiousness A?. The theory of indirect communication and the existential ethics of which it is a part demand that the individual's freedom be literally ?thought at every moment? ? a requirement which is as divorced from the circumstances of actual existence as Hegel's much maligned ?System?. The paper closes by considering the significance of Climacus? ?Absolute Paradox? for the subject's predicament and for Kierkegaard's authorship: does the notion of the Absolute Paradox represent an alternative to the subject's self?assertion, or is it merely its pre?eminent expression?
Similar books and articles
Illusion and satire in Kierkegaard's postscript.John Lippitt - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):451-466.
Re-radicalizing Kierkegaard: An alternative to Religiousness C in light of an investigation into the teleological suspension of the ethical. [REVIEW]Jack Mulder - 2002 - Continental Philosophy Review 35 (3):303-324.
Kierkegaard on the Need for Indirect Communication.Antony Aumann - 2008 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Faith, paradox, reason and the argumentum spiritus sancti in climacus and Kierkegaard.Alexander Pruss - manuscript
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs.Søren Kierkegaard - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Kierkegaard on Indirect Communication, the Crowd, and a Monstrous Illusion.Antony Aumann - 2010 - In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Point of View. Macon, GA, USA: Mercer University Press. pp. 295-324.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Voices of madness in Foucault and Kierkegaard.Heather C. Ohaneson - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (1):27-54.
How to be a Terrible Teacher: Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments on what Education is not.Stuart Dalton - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (3):241-264.
References found in this work
S Ren Kierkegaard's Journals and Papers. Edited and Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong, Assisted by Gregor Malantschuk. --. [REVIEW]Søen Kierkegaard, Howard Vincent Hong & Gregor Malantschuk - 1967 - Indiana University Press.