Embryo Gene Editing is Not Morally Better than Selection Even If Person-Affecting

American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):20-22 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 24, Issue 8, August 2024, Page 20-22.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2024.2361907

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,026

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Person-Affecting Reasons for Prenatal Gene-Editing?David Wasserman - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):22-24.
Gene Editing, Genetic Selection, and Reasons That Matter.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):27-29.
Gene Editing vs. Genetic Selection.Ralf Bader Université de Fribourg - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):31-34.
What’s the Alternative? Comparative Benefits in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):24-26.
From CRISPR to Conscience: Ethical Dilemmas in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Shu Ishida & Tsutomu Sawai - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):67-70.
Place-Based Thoughtfulness and Decision-Making in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Andrew Crowden & Matthew Gildersleeve - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):53-55.
Repro-Timing Harm and Benefit in Assisted Reproduction: Person-Affecting Reasons Before the Advent of Genome Editing.Davide Battisti - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):60-62.
When Gene Editing Should Be Mandatory.Thomas Liang & Eric Mathison - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):65-67.
Reasons, Persons, Eugenics and an Argument in Favour of Gene Editing.Rebecca Bennett - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):37-40.
Grounded in Reality: Integrating Community Values and Priorities of End Users in Human Gene Editing.Kirsten A. Riggan, Roel Feys, Assata Kokayi, Karen M. Meagher, Marsha Michie, Kiran Musunuru, Kelly E. Ormond, Andrea J. Schelhaas, Jane Q. Yap, Rosario Isasi & Megan A. Allyse - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):43-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-20

Downloads
15 (#1,315,444)

6 months
13 (#245,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tina Rulli
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Gene editing, identity and benefit.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):305-325.
Reproductive CRISPR does not cure disease.Tina Rulli - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (9):1072-1082.
What Are the Wider Implications of Sparrow’s Benefit Argument?David Wasserman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):28-30.

Add more references