Schism, syncretism and politics: Derived and implied social model in the self-definition of early Christian orthodoxy

HTS Theological Studies 75 (4):1-9 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first 400 years of Christianity posed an intricate scenario of social dynamics. The interplay of these social dynamics or catalysts analogous to time perceivably conceived the political-religious establishment that then forged orthodoxy. The resultant continuum that was consequent of the imperial religious-political merger upon the following eras further established a formative impact of these catalysts. As a revisionist analysis of the era leading up to the Constantinian turn, and a parallel comparison between preceding and following eras, this research proposes an alternate construction to the narrative of Early Christianity orthodoxy. The preceding position derives from the attempt at the development of a modular theory through which Christianity can be analysed. Through document analysis, a literature review was accomplished. The development of early Christianity from inception to 400 CE when deduced against enculturating influences implies a sociological study. From the three perceived phases that Christianity went through, Jewish-Christian schism, Hellenism and then imperial interventional politics, implications can be made upon latter eras and derivations can be deduced from earlier eras. Significantly, there seems to have been a resurgent theme in the person of religious-political institutions that consolidated their positions. The synergy and inevitability of the process that preceded the first ecumenical council are confirmed in both a positive and negative substantiation of the proposed model. The emergent episcopal leadership in Christianity and its consolidation averse to the political dynamics of imperial Rome implied a composite significance of all factors. Similarly, the intransigent nature of certain African Christian elements argues for the inevitability of cultural enculturation as precedent to political definition in the formation of a universal orthodoxy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vladimir Soloviev on Christian Politics and Ecumenism.James Likoudis - 2011 - Catholic Social Science Review 16:195-211.
Is ground a strict partial order?Michael Raven - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):191-199.
The Distinction of Fields.Barry M. Mitnick - 2019 - Business and Society 58 (7):1309-1333.
The Advent of Postmodern Robotic Technoreligiosity.James McBride - 2015 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 25 (2):25-38.
Islamic thought and the public sphere: A synthesis.Moh’D. Khair Eiedat - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (4-5):503-513.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-25

Downloads
15 (#923,100)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references