The morally disruptive future of reprogenetic enhancement technologies

, &
Trends in Biotechnology (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Emerging reprogenetic technologies may enable the enhancement of our offspring's genes. Beyond raising ethical questions, these biotechnologies may change some aspects of future morality. In the reproductive field, biotechnological innovations may transform moral views about reproductive choices regarding what we consider to be just or even of equal standing.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Paper: What is morally salient about enhancement technologies?Auke J. K. Pols & Wybo Houkes - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):84-87.
Rethinking Reprogenetics: Enhancing Ethical Analyses of Reprogenetic Technologies.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2016 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Integration of cognitive and moral enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
Moral Enhancement and Those Left Behind.Alfred Archer - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (7):500-510.
Moral enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
The inevitability of genetic enhancement technologies.Francoise Baylis & Jason Scott Robert - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (1):1–26.
From cognitive to moral enhancement: A possible reconciliation of religious outlooks and the biotechnological creation of a better human.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):113-128.
From Self‐Determination to Offspring‐Determination? Reproductive Autonomy, Procrustean Parenting, and Genetic Enhancement.Jon Rueda - 2021 - Theoria 88 (6):1086-1110.
Beyond Human Nature: Human-Racism in the Debate Over Genetic and Nanotechnological Enhancement.James J. Hughes - 2007 - In Nanoscale. New York, NY, USA: pp. 61-70.
Disruptive Technologies and the Sport Ecosystem: A Few Ethical Questions.Migle Laukyte - 2020 - Philosophies 5 (4):24.
Why Internal Moral Enhancement Might Be politically Better than External Moral Enhancement.John Danaher - 2016 - Neuroethics 12 (1):39-54.
Human Enhancement.Eric Juengst & Daniel Moseley - 2016 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Enhancement Technologies and the Person: Christian Perspectives.Andrew Lustig - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):41-50.
Moral Perfection and the Demand for Human Enhancement.Adriana Warmbier - 2015 - Ethics in Progress 2015 (No.1).
A future political framework for moral enhancement.Vojin Rakić & Milan Ćirković - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies 30 (1):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-16

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jonathan Pugh
University of Oxford
Jon Rueda
University of Granada

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references