10. Can Philosophy Offer Help in Resolving Contemporary Biological Controversies?

In Borchert (ed.), Philosophy of Science. Macmillan (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroscience and Personhood.Dan Ernst - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 5:5-12.
Cultural studies and the new humanities: concepts and controversies.Patrick Fuery - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Nick Mansfield.
The challenge to biomedicine: A foundations perspective.Laurence Foss - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (2):165-191.
Review of Sober's "philosophy of biology". [REVIEW]J. Dupre - 1996 - British Journal for Philosophy of Science 63:143-145.
The philosophy of biology.David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) - 1973 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Controversies and Epistemology.Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:159-192.
On the uniqueness of biological research.Adolph Portmann - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):457-472.
Contemporary Moral Controversies in Business. [REVIEW]Daryl Close - 1991 - Teaching Philosophy 14 (4):479-482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references