Beauty, Horror, and Tragedy: The Idea of Hell in Jonathan Edwards and William James

Philosophy and Theology 26 (1):19-37 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Among theologians and philosophers in the American tradition, the idea of Hell is understood best through the works of Jonathan Edwards and William James. Both Edwards and James understood the idea of Hell as part of a worldview in which humans were humbled by their fallible nature. There are important differences between the views of Edwards and James, however, and these differences involve how each of them apprehends the suffering of other people. Edwards remains aesthetically aloof regarding the suffering of others, while James remains tragically tied to such suffering.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Horror and Mood.Andrea Sauchelli - 2014 - American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (1):39-50.
Horror.Aaron Smuts - 2008 - In Paisley Livingston & Carl Plantinga (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film.
The philosophy of horror.Thomas Richard Fahy (ed.) - 2010 - Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky.
Beauty.Roger Scruton - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Horror and Tragedy: The Wings and Center of the Moral Stage.Robert I. Levy - 1985 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 13 (2):175-187.
The paradox of painful art.Aaron Smuts - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):59-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-17

Downloads
24 (#620,575)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references