Shooting a Donkey: Accidents and Mistakes in Austin and McEwan

Philosophy and Literature 37 (2):421-434 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1956, members of the Aristotelian Society found themselves treated (or subjected) to a talk entitled “A Plea for Excuses,” which formed the annual presidential address by the then incumbent, J. L. Austin. Now remembered chiefly as one of the clearest and briefest exemplars of ordinary language philosophy at work—an exciting new development back in the mid-nineteen-fifties—it actually set out to investigate the role ordinary language plays in delineating the boundaries of freedom and responsibility.1 Part of this exercise involved considering the difference between doing something “by accident” and doing it “by mistake”—a subtle and often elusive distinction because, as Austin says, these expressions are mostly ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Austin on sense-data: Ordinary language analysis as 'therapy'.Eugen Fischer - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):67-99.
On Parasitic Language.Manjulika Ghosh - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:43-48.
A plea for excuses.J. L. Austin - 1964 - In Vere Claiborne Chappell (ed.), Ordinary language: essays in philosophical method. New York: Dover Publications. pp. 1--30.
The texaco incident.J. Whitman Hoff - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):365 - 369.
Naturalising Austin.Renia Gasparatou - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):329-343.
Reading Austin Rhetorically.Andrew Munro - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):22-43.
Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
The happy truth: J. L. Austin's how to do things with words.Alice Crary - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):59 – 80.
To Austin or not to Austin, that's the disjunction.Robert Schwartz - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
On Juren Habermas’s Misinterpretation of J.L. Austin.Aydan Turanl - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:237-243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-21

Downloads
37 (#409,683)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references