Introduction: Scientific History


In his inaugural lecture at Cambridge as Regius Professor of Modern History in 1895, Lord Acton urged that the historian deliver moral judgments on the figures of his research. Acton declaimed: I exhort you never to debase the moral currency or to lower the standard of rectitude, but to try others by the final maxim that governs your own lives and to suffer no man and no cause to escape the undying penalty which history has the power to inflict on wrong.1 In 1902, the year after Acton died, the president of the American Historical Association, Henry Lea, in dubious celebration of his British colleague, responded to the exordium with a contrary claim about the historian’s obligation, namely to render the facts of history objectively without subjective moralizing. Referring to Acton’s lecture, Lea declared: I must confess that to me all this seems to be based on false premises and to lead to unfortunate conclusions as to the objects and purposes of history, however much it may serve to give point and piquancy to a narrative, to stimulate the interests of the casual reader by heightening lights and deepening shadows, and to subserve the purpose of propagating the opinions of the writer.2 As our colleague Peter Novick has detailed in his great account of the American historical profession, by the turn of the century historians in the United States had begun their quest for scientific status, which for most seemed to preclude the leakage of moral opinion into the objective recovery of the past—at least in an overt way. Peter also catalogues the stumbling failures of this noble dream, when political partisanship and rampant nationalism sullied the ideal.3 Historians in our own time continue to be wary of rendering explicit moral pronouncements, thinking it a derogation of their obligations. On occasion, some historians have been moved to embrace the opposite attitude, especially when considering the horrendous events of the twentieth century—the Holocaust, for instance..



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Historical Inquiry.Leonard Mendes Marsak (ed.) - 1977 - R. E. Krieger Publishing Company.
History and Historians in the Twentieth Century.Peter Burke (ed.) - 2002 - Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
On the Difference Between a Pupil and a Historian of Ideas.Jeffrey Edward Green - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):84-110.


Added to PP

35 (#335,965)

6 months
1 (#450,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Pippin
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

Thick Narratives.John Gibson - 2011 - In John Gibson & Noel Carroll (eds.), Narrative, Emotion, and Insight. PSUP. pp. 69.
Zarathustra Hermeneutics.Paul S. Loeb - 2011 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 41 (1):94-114.
Zarathustra Is Dead, Long Live Zarathustra!Adrian Del Caro - 2011 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 41 (1):83-93.
Zarathustra Is Dead, Long Live Zarathustra!Adrian Del Caro - 2011 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 41 (1):83-93.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references