Philosophical Books 50 (1):55-62 (2009)

Authors
George Hilding Rudebusch
Northern Arizona University
Abstract
The review argues that Plato makes a valid distinction between inferior hypothetical and superior unhypothetical methods. Given the distinction, the book confuses the hypothetical for unhypothetical dialectic.
Keywords Plato  Dialectic  Divided Line
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0149.2009.00484.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Christopher Rowe, Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing. [REVIEW]Chloe Balla - 2009 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 11:71-75.
Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing.Ruby Blondell - 2009 - American Journal of Philology 130 (3):465-468.
An Introduction to Plato's Laws.Christopher Rowe - 1984 - Philosophical Books 25 (4):195-197.
Plato: Protagoras.Christopher Rowe & C. C. W. Taylor - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):353.
Plato: Theaetetus and Sophist.Christopher Rowe (ed.) - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
The Good and the Just in Plato's Gorgias.Christopher Rowe - 2008 - Philosophical Inquiry 30 (3-4):55-75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
256 ( #39,451 of 2,461,917 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #20,023 of 2,461,917 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes