The CI Review [Book Review]

Critical Inquiry 47 (1):181-182 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/710914

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A review on a peer review.Andrej Poleev - 2016 - Enzymes 14.
Some Opinions on the Review Process of Research Papers Destined for Publication.Ehsan Roohi & Omid Mahian - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):809-812.
Review of Spirituality in Daily Life: Experiencing God Everyday. [REVIEW]Subhasis Chattopadhyay - 2014 - The Vedanta Kesari 101 (5):201-2.
‘Peer review’ culture.Malcolm Atkinson - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):193-204.
Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry.David Shatz - 2004 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
The ethics of peer review in bioethics.David Wendler & Franklin Miller - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):697-701.
Judicial Review, Administrative Review, and Constitutional Review in the Weimar Republic.Michael Stolleis - 2003 - Ratio Juris 16 (2):266-280.
Review: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective * Review: Problems of Rationality * Review: Truth, Language, and History. [REVIEW]Kirk Ludwig - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):405-416.
Ecological roots: which go deepest? Review of Marx's ecology by John Bellamy Foster.Helena Sheehan - 2000 - Monthly Review.
'Peer review' culture.Dr Malcolm Atkinson - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):193-204.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
Review Essays: Keynes and Macroeconomics after 70 Years.Thomas Francis - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):269-277.
Raab Francis V.. A criterion of necessity. The review of metaphysics, vol. 6 no. 1 , p. 123.Wells Rulon. Comments on Mr. Raab's theses. The review of metaphysics, p. 124.Brandt Richard. Comments on Mr. Raab's theses. The review of metaphysics, pp. 125–126.Johnstone Henry W. Jr. Comments on Mr. Raab's theses. The review of metaphysics, pp. 126–127.Thompson Manley. Comments on Mr. Raab's theses. The review of metaphysics, pp. 127–128.Bergmann Gustav. Comments on Mr. Raab's theses. The review of metaphysics, pp. 128–129.Raab Francis V.. Response to comments. The review of metaphysics, pp. 130–131. [REVIEW]Christopher Blake - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):291-292.
Peer review: Selecting the best science. [REVIEW]Wendy Baldwin & Belinda Seto - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):11-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-23

Downloads
8 (#1,283,306)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references