Descartes's case for dualism

Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1):29-63 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Descartes's dualism, and his argument for it, are often understood in terms of the modal notion of separability. I argue that the central notions, substance and real distinction, should not be understood this way. Descartes's well-known argument for dualism relies implicitly on views he spells out in the Principles of Philosophy, where he explains that a substance has a nature that consists in a single attribute, and all its qualities are modes of that nature. The argument relies ultimately on a deeply rationalistic view of substance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes’s Dualism.Marleen Rozemond - 1998 - In Janet Broughton & John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 372–389.
Decartes' dualism.Gordon P. Baker - 2002 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Katherine J. Morris.
Descartes’s Dualism.Marleen Rozemond - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
247 (#77,106)

6 months
12 (#145,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marleen Rozemond
University of Toronto, Mississauga

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references