The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge

Revista de Filosofia Aurora 22 (30):99 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The following pages contend that, in spite of its intensive development, contemporary cognitive science has recently entered a phase of fairly acute uncertainty and confusion regarding some of its most essential foundations. They emphasize two aspects of this foundational crisis, specifically vindicating the existence of a crisis of naturalism and of a crisis of representationalism. Like any foundational crisis, this situation constitutes a serious threat to the significance of the empirical achievements of cognitive science. A threat calling for renewed efforts to provide it with secure foundations that can only be obtained through acloser collaboration between empirical and foundational investigations, or, more concretely, between cognitive scientists and philosophers. They also outline a general strategy to address this threat, and illustrate itabout one aspect of particular importance of the naturalist crisis, namely the emergentist challenge to the orthodoxy of non reductive functionalism. They argue for the rejection of one version of this emergentist challenge,and they lay out a minimal condition that any other version of emergentism must meet. It is still unclear whether this condition is yet satisfactorily met by some version, and in particular by the sort of emergentism associated with the notion of dynamical system. Clarifyingthis issue should accordingly be seen as a top priority on the agenda of cognitive philosophy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The predicament of experience.Harold Mah - 2008 - Modern Intellectual History 5 (1):97-119.
Introduction: Philosophy and Cognitive Science.Richard Samuels, Eric Margolis & Stephen Stich - 2012 - In Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 3-18.
A (post)foundational approach to the philosophy of science: Part II. [REVIEW]Dimitri Ginev - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):57 - 74.
The challenge from biology to cognitive science.Thomas H. Leahey - 1986 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):31-36.
Levels of Description in Nonclassical Cognitive Science.Terence Horgan & John Tienson - 1993 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 34:159-188.
A (Post)Foundational Approach to the Philosophy of Science: Part II.Dimitri Ginev - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):57-74.
Freedom, Consciousness, and Science: An Emergentist Response to the Challenge.Philip Clayton - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 985--998.
Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. [REVIEW]Rick Dale - 2010 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 31 (1-2).
Cognitive Anthropology Is a Cognitive Science.James S. Boster - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):372-378.


Added to PP

19 (#675,238)

6 months
1 (#1,014,737)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jean-Michel Roy
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references