Passing the Buck: How the Academy of Medical Sciences's 'New Pathway for the Regulation and Governance of Health Research' Shifts the Regulatory Burden but Fails to Improve the Quality of Research Governance

Research Ethics 7 (3):82-90 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper the author argues that the Academy of Medical Sciences's ‘Review of the regulation and governance of medical research’ has produced a set of muddled recommendations that could increase complexity and uncertainty in research governance rather than reduce it. Issues discussed in the paper include the additional legal burden placed upon the newly proposed Health Research Agency by the plan for a National Research Governance Service and its system of centralized permissions, the consequences that this may have for the research ethics committees in the discharge of their legal duty, and the unanswered questions surrounding the TGN1412 incident

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Regulation and the social licence for medical research.Mary Dixon-Woods & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):381-391.
Reflections on Governance Models for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells.Jeremy Sugarman - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):251-256.
Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review.Mark Israel - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):525-526.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
39 (#386,963)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?