'Of the standard of taste': Decisions, rules and critical argument

In Alan Bailey & Dan O'Brien (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Hume. Continuum. pp. 349 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Decisions as statistical evidence and Birnbaum's 'confidence concept'.John W. Pratt - 1977 - Synthese 36 (1):59 - 69.
Rejecting the baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the best interests standard.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):331 – 352.
Hume’s Aesthetic Standard.Elisa Galgut - 2012 - Hume Studies 38 (2):183-200.
Rules and standards in the application of international humanitarian law.Amichai Cohen - unknown
Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste.Theodore Gracyk - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Faultless or Disagreeement.Andrea Iacona - 2008 - In Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Max Kolbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 287.
Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.
Of the standard of taste, and other essays.David Hume - 1965 - Indianapolis,: Bobbs-Merrill. Edited by John W. Lenz.
On the 'standard' argument for fatalism.David Buller - 1995 - Philosophical Papers 24 (2):111-125.
A Peircean theory of decision.Berit Brogaard - 1999 - Synthese 118 (3):383-401.
How Not to Enhance the Indispensability Argument.Russell Marcus - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):345-360.
How Can a Sceptic Have a Standard of Taste?Susan Hahn - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (4):379-392.
Can kants deduction of judgments of taste be saved?Miles Rind - 2002 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (1):20-45.
Morality and parenting: An ethical framework for decisions about the treatment of imperiled newborns.Jeffrey Blustein - 1988 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references