Authors
Paul A. Roth
University of California, Santa Cruz
Abstract
For the better part of the 20th century, expositions of issues regarding historical explanation followed a predictable format, one that took as given the nonequivalence of explanations in history and philosophical models of scientific explanation. Ironically, at the present time, the philosophical point of note concerns how the notion of science has itself changed. Debates about explanation in turn need to adapt to this. This prompts the question of whether anything now still makes plausible the thought that history must make some forced choice with regard to the type of science it is and an associated explanatory form. The discussion that follows sketches the alternative forms of explanation between which historians were to pick, and indicates why each proves unsatisfactory. Examination of these issues allows identification of a conception of historical explanation that does not require the metaphysical and epistemological assumptions that engender previous dichotomous characterizations.
Keywords POSITIVISM   NARRATIVE   EVENTS   HISTORICAL EXPLANATION   PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY   NATURAL SCIENCE
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/187226308X315040
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Defence of Story-Telling.Adrian Currie & Kim Sterelny - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 62:14-21.
Intentionalism, Intentional Realism, and Empathy.Karsten Stueber - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (3):290-307.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Covering Laws in Historical Practice.Sten Spam Nikon - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):445-463.
Viability Explanation.Arno Wouters - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):435-457.
The Interrogative Model: Historical Inquiry and Explanation.Eric Brook - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (2):137-159.
Understanding Narrative Explanation: An Eclectic Approach.Björn Eriksson - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):317-344.
Functional Explanation, Consequence Explanation, and Marxism.G. A. Cohen - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):27 – 56.
A Problem of Our Own Making: Roth on Historical Explanation.John H. Zammito - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):244-249.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
115 ( #103,047 of 2,519,576 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,019 of 2,519,576 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes