The epistemology of "epistemology naturalized"

Dialectica 53 (2):87–110 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Quine's “Epistemology Naturalized” has become part of the canon in epistemology and excited a widespread revival of interest in naturalism. Yet the status accorded the essay is ironic, since both friends and foes of philosophical naturalism deny that Quine makes a plausible case that the methods of naturalism can accommodate the problems of epistemology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#204,784)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul A. Roth
University of California, Santa Cruz

Citations of this work

Quine's Argument from Despair.Sander Verhaegh - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):150-173.
Quine’s Argument from Despair.Sander Verhaegh - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):150-173.
Quine on Evidence.Robert Sinclair - 2013 - In Ernie Lepore & Gilbert Harman (eds.), A Companion to W. V. O. Quine. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 350–372.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references