Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):153-161 (2010)

Authors
Amanda Roth
State University of New York at Geneseo
Abstract
I argue that a number of non-utopian accounts of ethical progress—specifically, those offered by Wiggins, Moody-Adams, and Rorty—face a trade-off between objectivity and the radical revision of values. I suggest that each of these views is unsatisfactory because they face the Goldilocks problem—none of the views is able to get the trade-off between objectivity and radical revision of values “just right.” Moody-Adams and Wiggins offer accounts which are too conservative with regard to ethical progress in not allowing radical revision of values, while Rorty’s account is too liberal in not maintaining enough objectivity. Despite thisdifficulty, however, I conclude on an optimistic note about the potential of non-utopian accounts of progress. I sketch out a Dewey-inspired view of progress which I believe can overcome the Goldilocks problem.
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0897-2346
DOI swphilreview201026117
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Achieving Moral Progress Despite Moral Regress.Ben Dixon - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:157-172.
Achieving Moral Progress Despite Moral Regress.Ben Dixon - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:157-172.
Defending the Radical Center.Keith Parsons - 2005 - In Noretta Koertge (ed.), Scientific Values and Civic Virtues. Oup Usa. pp. 159.
Language and the Objectivity of Value.Delilah R. Caldwell - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Kansas
A Procedural, Pragmatist Account of Ethical Objectivity.Amanda Roth - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (2):169-200.
Radical Liberal Values‐Based Practice.Tim Thornton - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):988-991.
The Objectivity of Values: Invariance Without Explanation.Aaron James - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):581-605.
Ethics: A Radical-Constructivist Approach.A. Quale - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):256-261.
Psychologies of Love.Paul Halmos - 1966 - Philosophy 41 (155):58 - 69.
Situated Objectivity.Malcolm Williams - 2005 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (1):99–120.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total views
41 ( #276,816 of 2,507,886 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,886 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes