Journal of Social Philosophy 49 (2):270-293 (2018)

Authors
Amanda Roth
State University of New York at Geneseo
Abstract
In this paper I take up (what I call) the pregnancy loss objection to defenses of abortion that deny fetal moral status. Though versions of this objection have been put forth by others—particularly Lindsey Porter’s in a 2015 paper—I argue that the existing versions of the objection are unsuccessful in various ways: failing to explain the ground of moral considerability that would apply to embryos/fetuses in very early pregnancy, lack of clarity about what it means to take grief after miscarriage seriously, and implausible implications regarding pre-embryo and infertility cases. I go on to offer a more plausible version of the objection, which I apply only to mid-pregnancy and fetuses, by drawing on personal narratives of later pregnancy loss and abortion and emphasizing practices that indicate the relevant kind of mourning. I then take up the question of how experience of the sort I have in mind can function as evidence, by situating my version of the objection in a pragmatist ethical view. Finally I consider and respond to some worries about the very idea of taking experience of pregnancy loss to be evidence regarding fetal moral status.
Keywords pregnancy loss  fetal status  pragmatism  abortion  gradualism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/josp.12234
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Abortion and Infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1):37-65.
After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?Alberto Giubilini & Francesca Minerva - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):261-263.
The Evidence of Experience.Joan W. Scott - 1991 - Critical Inquiry 17 (4):773-797.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Don't Risk Homicide: Abortion After 10 Weeks Gestation.Matthew Braddock - forthcoming - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Editors' Introduction.Ann J. Cahill, Kathryn J. Norlock & Byron J. Stoyles - 2015 - Journal of Social Philosophy 46 (1):1-8.
Language is a Form of Experience: Reconciling Classical Pragmatism and Neopragmatism.Colin Koopman - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):694 - 727.
Attitudes of Women to Fetal Tissue Research.F. Anderson, A. Glasier, J. Ross & D. T. Baird - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):36-40.
When Is an Abortion Not an Abortion?Kimberly Mutcherson - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):206-210.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-26

Total views
80 ( #144,981 of 2,507,332 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #25,601 of 2,507,332 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes