Discerning the Limits of Religious Naturalism

Zygon 36 (3):467-475 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to my “How to Make Naturalism Safe for Supernaturalism: An Evaluation of Willem Drees's Supernaturalistic Naturalism” (Rottschaefer 2001), Willem Drees maintains that I have misunderstood his purpose and views and have failed to make the case against his view that naturalism is intrinsically limited. In this response, I comment on these concerns.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Promise of Religious Naturalism.Walter Gulick - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (3):271-276.
Advantages and limits of naturalism.Mario Bunge - 2009 - In John R. Shook & Paul Kurtz (eds.), The future of naturalism. Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.
Naturalism: its impact on science, religion and literature.Hyung S. Choi, David F. Siemens & Shirley E. Williams (eds.) - 2001 - Phoenix, Ariz.: Canyon Institute for Advanced Studies.
Naturalism and self-defeat: Plantinga's version.N. M. L. Nathan - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142.
Pluralism, Normative Naturalism, and Biological Taxonomy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:382-389.
Mystical naturalism.Leonard Angel - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (3):317-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
48 (#324,723)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William A. Rottschaefer
Boston University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references