Can Post-Newtonian Psychologists Find Happiness in a Pre-Paradigm Science?

Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (1):87-98 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a commentary on the essays by Faulconer , Leahey , Rawling , Slife , Vandenberg , and Williams . Whatever the differences among these essays, they nonetheless share a common concern with the image of science which Newton promulgated. What might be termed the Newtonian meta-paradigm is positivistic, in the contemporary sense. This meta-paradigm has survived the demise of the Newtonian paradigm in physics. Each of the authors in this volume, in turn, is concerned with how to expose, and so liberate, psychology from the grip of this meta-paradigm. I comment briefly on their respective strategies and relative success in doing so

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Idealizing the Cartesian-Newtonian Paradigm as Reality: The Impact of New-Paradigm Physics on Psychological Theory.J. Wade - 1997 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 56:9-34.
Kant and the Newtonian paradigm.Rh Wettstein - 1980 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34 (133):575-598.
Waiting for Newton.Thomas Leahey - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (1):9-20.
The spell of Kuhn on psychology: An exegetical elixir.William O'Donohue - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (3):267 – 287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul A. Roth
University of California, Santa Cruz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references