Zeno Beach

Phronesis 65 (4):467-500 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On Zeno Beach there are infinitely many grains of sand, each half the size of the last. Supposing Aristotle denied the possibility of Zeno Beach, did he have a good argument for the denial? Three arguments, each of ancient origin, are examined: the beach would be infinitely large; the beach would be impossible to walk across; the beach would contain a part equal to the whole, whereas parts must be lesser. It is attempted to show that none of these arguments was Aristotle’s. Indeed, perhaps Aristotle’s finitism applied to magnitude only, not plurality.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-11

Downloads
566 (#33,045)

6 months
145 (#25,349)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacob Rosen
University of Pittsburgh