- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Unwarranted popularity of a power function for heaviness estimates
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):159-160 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Epistemology of Popularity and Incentives.Dan Moller - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):148-156.
Analyses of baby name popularity distribution in U.S. for the last 131 years.Wentian Li - 2013 - Complexity 18 (1):44-50.
On the decidability of the real field with a generic power function.Gareth Jones & Tamara Servi - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (4):1418-1428.
Affordance, proper function, and the physical basis of perceived heaviness.M. T. Turvey, Kevin Shockley & Claudia Carello - 1999 - Cognition 73 (2):B17-B26.
Popular Search. Popularity - 2005 - In Alan F. Blackwell & David MacKay (eds.), Power. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3.
Unwarranted assumptions about children's testimonial accuracy.Steven Ceci, Sarah Kulkofskey, J. Zoe Klemfuss, Charlotte D. Sweeney & Maggie Bruck - manuscript
Category judgments of loudness in the absence of an experimenter-induced identification function: Sequential effects and power-function fit.Lawrence M. Ward - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (2):179.
A competitive test of the descriptive accuracy of the characteristic function, power function, and shapley value based function.Melvin M. Sakurai - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (3):259-278.
Unwarranted questions and conversation.Steffen Borge - 2007 - Journal of Pragmatics 39 (10):1689-1701.
Some sources of error in half-heaviness judgments.Trygg Engen & Ülker Tulunay - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (3):208.
Biological effects of low level radiation: Values, dose-response models, risk estimates.Helen E. Longino - 1989 - Synthese 81 (3):391 - 404.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
26 (#574,431)
6 months
10 (#213,340)
2014-01-20
Downloads
26 (#574,431)
6 months
10 (#213,340)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Psychophysical scaling methods reveal and measure context effects.Gregory R. Lockhead - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):607-612.
Bias by stimuli presented before the start of an investigation.E. C. Poulton - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):604-605.
Psychophysical scaling: A conditional defense of R=f(I).Adam Reeves - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):605-606.
Processing attributes and judging objects.Dominic W. Massaro - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):601-602.
Weight and mass as psychophysical attributes.Helen E. Ross - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):606-607.
References found in this work
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition.James J. Gibson - 1979 - Houghton Mifflin.
Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1984 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-9lpj8 uwo