The ontological motivations for the theory of descriptions

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):114–134 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Russell's “On Denoting” is a work in ontology, not the philosophy of language or logic. Specifically, I claim that it addresses two ontological problems: (1) What is the proper analysis of the truth‐makers for sentences containing definite descriptions? (2) What is the proper analysis of the connection between those sentences and their truth‐makers?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descriptions: Points of Reference.Kent Bach - 2004 - In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Clarendon Press. pp. 189-229.
The King of France Restored.Max Rosenkrantz - 2007 - Metaphysica 8 (2):149-163.
The Indefinability of “One”.Laurence Goldstein - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):29-42.
Descriptions: An Annotated Bibliography.Berit Brogaard - 2010 - Oxford Annotated Bibliographies Online.
Descriptions with an attitude problem.Murali Ramachandran - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):721-723.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#351,926)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max Rosenkrantz
California State University, Long Beach

Citations of this work

A Reconstruction of Russell's Gray's Elegy Argument.Max Rosenkrantz - 2017 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6 (2).
The King of France Restored.Max Rosenkrantz - 2007 - Metaphysica 8 (2):149-163.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references