The justification of induction

Philosophy of Science 59 (4):527-539 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show there is only one consistent way to update a probability assignment, that given by Bayes's rule. The price of inconsistent updating is a loss of efficiency. The implications of this for the problem of induction are discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The rationality of induction.David Charles Stove - 1986 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Inference, practice and theory.F. John Clendinnen - 1977 - Synthese 34 (1):89 - 132.
Induction and objectivity.F. John Clendinnen - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):215-229.
Induction and justification.Frederick L. Will - 1974 - Ithaca [N.Y.]: Cornell University Press.
Counter-induction.John L. Pollock - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):284 – 294.
The justification of induction.Richard Swinburne (ed.) - 1974 - New York]: Oxford University Press.
The problem of induction.James Cargile - 1998 - Philosophy 73 (2):247-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
279 (#70,048)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Mathematical Theory of Communication.Claude Elwood Shannon - 1948 - Bell System Technical Journal 27 (April 1924):379–423.
On the principle of total evidence.Irving John Good - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (4):319-321.
On inductive logic.Rudolf Carnap - 1945 - Philosophy of Science 12 (2):72-97.
Philosophy of science naturalized.Ronald N. Giere - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):331-356.
Conditionalization and expected utility.Peter M. Brown - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):415-419.

View all 7 references / Add more references