The identity of, and the difference between, analytical and continental philosophy

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):341 – 348 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper intends to invoke the spirit of Hegel as the éminence grise behind analytical and continental philosophy. Both movements can be seen to originate in, or to receive a strong impetus in their development from, a repudiation of Hegel. Even Russell's quest for a systematic logical analysis of language may be seen as an attempt at a quasi- or anti-Hegelian systematicity. The collapse of this systematicity has led to the celebration of difference in both the analytical and continental schools. Another feature of contemporary philosophy is the priority given to invention and creativity over discovery. In this respect, Nietzsche is the master-figure underlying all contemporary allegiance to, and indeed, obsession with, the twin idols of creation and difference.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From a continental point of view: The role of logic in the analytic-continental divide.Franca D'Agostini - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):349 – 367.
Hegel and Derrida on the problem of reason and repression.David C. Durst - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (1):1-17.
What is continental philosophy?Simon Critchley - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.
The role of rules.Michael Rosen - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):369 – 384.
What is analytical philosophy?Cesare Cozzo - 1999 - In Rosaria Egidi (ed.), In Search of a New Humanism. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 55-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
143 (#125,844)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?