The doctrine of specific etiology

Biology and Philosophy 33 (5-6):37 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern medicine is often said to have originated with nineteenth century germ theory, which attributed diseases to bacterial contagions. The success of this theory is often associated with an underlying principle referred to as the “doctrine of specific etiology”. This doctrine refers to specificity at the level of disease causation or etiology. While the importance of this doctrine is frequently emphasized in the philosophical, historical, and medical literature, these sources lack a clear account of the types of specificity that it involves and why exactly they matter. This paper argues that nineteenth century germ theory involves two types of specificity at the level of etiology. One type receives significant attention in the literature, but its influence on modern medicine has been misunderstood. A second type is present in this model, but it has been completely overlooked in the extant literature. My analysis clarifies how these types of specificity led to a novel conception of etiology that continues to figure in medicine today.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Swampman, Etiology, and Content.Brendan J. Lalor - 1998 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (2):215-232.
Etiology in human and animal ethnomedicine.Edward C. Green - 1998 - Agriculture and Human Values 15 (2):127-131.
Pasteur, Pastorians, and the Dawn of Immunology: The Importance of Specificity.Arthur M. Silverstein - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (1):29 - 41.
What is a genetic cause? The example of Alzheimer’s Disease.Wim Dekkers & Marcel Olde Rikkert - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (3):273-284.
Functional analysis and etiology.Ron McClamrock - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (2):249-260.
Consequence etiology and biological teleology in Aristotle and Darwin.David J. Depew - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (4):379-390.
Biological markers: Search for villains in psychiatry.Lawrence Greenman - 2004 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 25 (3):213-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
66 (#251,409)

6 months
27 (#113,775)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lauren N. Ross
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

Reframing the environment in data-intensive health sciences.Stefano Canali & Sabina Leonelli - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93:203-214.
Explanation in contexts of causal complexity : lessons from psychiatric genetics.Lauren N. Ross - 2023 - In William C. Bausman, Janella K. Baxter & Oliver M. Lean (eds.), From biological practice to scientific metaphysics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causes and Conditions.J. L. Mackie - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4):245 - 264.
The problem of variable choice.James Woodward - 2016 - Synthese 193 (4):1047-1072.

View all 21 references / Add more references