Social Theory and Practice 46 (4):847-867 (2020)
Abstract |
The all-affected principle, by which all those affected by the policies of the state ought to be included in the demos governing it, is often considered prima facie attractive but, upon closer examination, implausible. The main alternative, according to which all those and only those affected by possible consequences of possible decisions ought to be included in the demos, is equally implausible. I suggest a reformulated principle: the demos includes all those affected by foreseeable consequences of decisions that the state has legal authority and capacity to take. This avoids the problems of the standard version and the main alternative.
|
Keywords | Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Social and Political Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.5840/soctheorpract2020112107 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Representing Non-Citizens: A Proposal for the Inclusion of All Affected Interests.Benjamin Boudou - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
Contributivist Views on Democratic Inclusion: On Economic Contribution as a Condition for the Right to Vote.Jonas Hultin Rosenberg & Fia Sundevall - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-25.
The Democratic Inclusion of Artificial Intelligence? Exploring the Patiency, Agency and Relational Conditions for Demos Membership.Ludvig Beckman & Jonas Hultin Rosenberg - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (2):1-24.
Similar books and articles
The All Affected Principle, and the Weighting of Votes.Kim Angell & Robert Huseby - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (4):366-381.
How Do Affected Interests Support Global Democracy?Vuko Andrić - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3):264-278.
The Discourse Principle and Those Affected.Gunnar Skirbekk - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):63 – 71.
Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle.Annette Zimmermann - 2018 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2).
Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle.Annette Zimmermann - 2017 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2):1-21.
Against the Principle of All Affected Interests.Zoltan Miklosi - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (3):483-503.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Principle of Equivalence Reconsidered: Assessing the Relevance of the Principle of Equivalence in Prison Medicine”.Fabrice Jotterand & Tenzin Wangmo - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):W3 - W4.
In Search of a Pointless Decision Principle.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhayay - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:260 - 269.
Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos: On the Place of the All Affected Interests Principle in Democratic Theory and in Resolving the Democratic Boundary Problem.David Owen - 2012 - Ethics and Global Politics 5 (3):129-152.
Freedom as Non-Domination and Democratic Inclusion.Ludvig Beckman & Jonas Hultin Rosenberg - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (2):181-198.
The Principle of Consequences Reconsidered.Marcus G. Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 31 (6):391 - 410.
How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
Democracy and Legitimacy in Plurinational Societies.Genevieve Nootens - 2009 - Contemporary Political Theory 8 (3):276-294.
The Power Principle: “Inherent Defects” Reconsidered.John Tomasi - 1989 - Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (2):56-60.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-11-07
Total views
9 ( #954,737 of 2,519,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,807 )
2020-11-07
Total views
9 ( #954,737 of 2,519,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads