Social Theory and Practice 46 (4):847-867 (2020)

Abstract
The all-affected principle, by which all those affected by the policies of the state ought to be included in the demos governing it, is often considered prima facie attractive but, upon closer examination, implausible. The main alternative, according to which all those and only those affected by possible consequences of possible decisions ought to be included in the demos, is equally implausible. I suggest a reformulated principle: the demos includes all those affected by foreseeable consequences of decisions that the state has legal authority and capacity to take. This avoids the problems of the standard version and the main alternative.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract2020112107
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Representing Non-Citizens: A Proposal for the Inclusion of All Affected Interests.Benjamin Boudou - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The All Affected Principle, and the Weighting of Votes.Kim Angell & Robert Huseby - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (4):366-381.
How Do Affected Interests Support Global Democracy?Vuko Andrić - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3):264-278.
The Discourse Principle and Those Affected.Gunnar Skirbekk - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):63 – 71.
Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle.Annette Zimmermann - 2018 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2).
Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle.Annette Zimmermann - 2017 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2):1-21.
Against the Principle of All Affected Interests.Zoltan Miklosi - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (3):483-503.
In Search of a Pointless Decision Principle.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhayay - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:260 - 269.
The Principle of Consequences Reconsidered.Marcus G. Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 31 (6):391 - 410.
How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
Democracy and Legitimacy in Plurinational Societies.Genevieve Nootens - 2009 - Contemporary Political Theory 8 (3):276-294.
The Power Principle: “Inherent Defects” Reconsidered.John Tomasi - 1989 - Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (2):56-60.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-07

Total views
9 ( #954,737 of 2,519,807 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,807 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes