Social manipulation, turn-taking and cooperation in apes

Interaction Studies 19 (1-2):151-166 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper outlines how the focus on how communicative signals might emerge and how the capacity to interpret them might develop, does not yet explain what type of motivation is required to actually deal with those signals. Without the consistent production of appropriate responses to the production of communicative signals, there would be no point in producing any signal. If language is a tool to accomplish things with others, we need to understand what would lead to cooperation. The first step consists in avoiding the blind belief that all cooperation requires some prosocial attitude. A great deal of cooperation can occur while each participant in the interaction is selfishly attempting to maximize their own benefits or minimizing damaging consequences.I describe how different types of turn-taking can be achieved via different levels of cognitive complexity and how interpretive turn-taking requires a great deal of cognitive abilities that great apes possess. Finally, I provide empirical evidence of social manipulation in non-human primates. Given our awareness of the occurrence of social manipulation during cooperation among human adults, it seems necessary to reconsider to what degree human communication and language evolution require unique prosocial motivations.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social influence: Representation, imagination and facts.Stéphane Laurens - 2007 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (4):401–413.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates.C. M. Heyes - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):101-114.
Why not go all the way.Richard Schuster - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):173-174.
Supernaturalizing Social Life.Matt J. Rossano - 2007 - Human Nature 18 (3):272-294.
Planet of the Apes and Philosophy: Great Apes Think Alike.John Huss (ed.) - 2013 - Chicago, Illinois: Open Court.


Added to PP

16 (#789,512)

6 months
4 (#368,572)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Language origins.Sławomir Wacewicz & Przemysław Żywiczyński - 2018 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 19 (1-2):167-182.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?David Premack & G. Woodruff - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (4):515-629.
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?David Premack & Guy Woodruff - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4):515-526.
Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine.N. Wiener - 1948 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:578-580.

View all 13 references / Add more references