Novelty preference in face perception by week-old lambs

Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 15 (1):113-128 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An extensive literature has been accumulating, in recent years, on face-processing in sheep and on the relevance of faces for social interaction in this species. In spite of this, spontaneous preferences for face or non-face stimuli in lambs have not been reported. In this study we tested the spontaneous preference of 8-day-old lambs for three pairs of stimuli. In each pair, one stimulus was a face-like display, whereas the other presented the same inner features displaced in unnatural positions. One pair of stimuli was obtained from photographic images of ewes’ faces, the other two pairs were schematic face-like stimuli. Lambs could differentiate the two stimuli obtained by photos of conspecifics, looking longer at the non-face stimulus. We interpret this as a novelty preference, proving that few day-old lambs have already encoded the structural properties that define a face and recognize violations of those general properties.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Categorization Influences Face Perception and Face Memory.Kurt Hugenberg, Don Sacco, Steven Young & Michael Bernstein - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.
The Role of Novelty in Early Word Learning.Emily Mather & Kim Plunkett - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (7):1157-1177.
Ear preference in auditory perception.M. P. Bryden - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):103.
Face perception and recognition in eyewitness memory.R. C. L. Lindsay, J. K. Mansour, N. Kalmet, M. I. Bertrand & L. Whaley - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.
Distributed neural systems for face perception.James V. Haxby & M. Ida Gobbini - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 93--110.
Sensitive periods in face perception.Daphne Maurer & Cathy Mondloch - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.
Face Perception and Perceptual Expertise in Adult and Developmental Populations.Lisa Scott - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 195.
Computer-Generated Images in Face Perception.Thomas Vetter & Mirella Walker - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 387.
Ecological and social approaches to face perception.Leslie Zebrowitz - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
13 (#973,701)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations