Handservant of Technocracy

Spontaneous Generations 10 (1):63-87 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The place of scientific expertise in democracy has become increasingly disputed, raising question who ought to have a say in decision-making about science and technology, with what authority, and for what reasons. Public engagement has become a common refrain in technoscientific discussions to address tensions in the rightful roles of experts and the public in democratic decision-making. However, precisely what public engagement entails, who it involves, how it is performed, and to what extent it is desirable for democratic societies remain contested matters. Nevertheless, strong commitments to greater public engagement in the governance of science and technology persist. This essay examines expert discussions about heritable human genome editing beginning from the 2015 International Summit on Human Genome Editing through the controversies surrounding of the first CRISPR-edited humans in late 2018 and the subsequent renewed calls for a moratorium on heritable human genome editing. I examine these discussions as example cases in which the right relations among experts, the public, and technoscientific decision-making are actively reconfigured. I argue that rather than expanding the range of included stakeholders, public engagement serves as an enabling handservant of technocracy that reinforces the position of scientific experts in decision-making as both epistemic and normative authorities.

Similar books and articles

Technocracy and Democracy: The Challenges to Development in Africa.Fea Owakah & Rd Aswani - 2009 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 1 (1):87-99.
Technocracy and Democracy: The Challenges to Development in Africa.Francis E. Owakah & Robert D. Aswani - 2009 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 1 (1):87-99.
A Family Affair: Populism, Technocracy, and Political Epistemology.Kevin J. Elliott - 2020 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 32 (1-3):85-102.
Technocracy, Governmentality, and Post-Structuralism.Oscar L. Larsson - 2020 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 32 (1-3):103-123.
Medical Technology: Indicator of Modern Technocracy.Raphael Sassower - 1986 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 6 (1):53-59.
Technocracy, Democracy, and U.S. Climate Politics: The Need for Demarcations.Myanna Lahsen - 2005 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 30 (1):137-169.
Architects and Engineers: Two Types of Technocrat and Their Relation to Democracy.Alfred Moore - 2020 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 32 (1):164-181.
Wittgensteinian Humanism, Democracy, and Technocracy.Eric B. Litwack - 2018 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 22 (3):314-333.
Political Epistemology Beyond Democratic Theory: Introduction to Symposium on Power Without Knowledge.Paul Gunn - 2020 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 32 (1-3):1-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-05

Downloads
81 (#188,993)

6 months
32 (#91,318)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chris Ross
Carleton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations