Definite Descriptions and the Argument from Inference

Philosophia 42 (4):1099-1109 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses the “Argument from Inference” raised against the view that definite descriptions are semantically referring expressions. According to this argument, the indicated view is inadequate since it evaluates some invalid inferences with definite descriptions as “valid” and vice versa. I argue that the Argument from Inference is basically wrong. Firstly, it is crucially based on the assumption that a proponent of the view that definite descriptions are referring expressions conceives them as directly referring terms, i.e., the terms which contribute their referents into the semantic content of the sentences in which they occur. However, the framework of direct reference is not essential to the idea that descriptions might have semantic referential interpretation. Secondly, the Argument of Inference - if correct - suffices to establish an overgeneralized conclusion that even paradigmatically referring terms, like proper names, cannot be semantically referential. This fact indicates that the argument is flawed. In the final part of this article, I briefly consider what the source of the problem with the Argument of Inference might be

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,140

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wettstein on definite descriptions.William K. Blackburn - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 53 (2):263 - 278.
¿Descripciones definidas referenciales?Pierre Baumann - 2011 - Princípios 18 (29):285-298.
Demonstrative reference and definite descriptions.Howard K. Wettstein - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 40 (2):241--257.
Ambiguous Articles: An Essay On The Theory Of Descriptions.Francesco Pupa - 2008 - Dissertation, The Graduate Center, Cuny
Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Puzzles about descriptive names.Edward Kanterian - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):409-428.
Descriptions which have grown capital letters.Brian Rabern - 2015 - Mind and Language 30 (3):292-319.
The double life of 'The mayor of Oakland'.Michael Rieppel - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (5):417-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-06

Downloads
39 (#301,087)

6 months
4 (#182,797)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Frege’s puzzle.Nathan Salmon - 1986 - Ridgeview.
The Reference Book.John Hawthorne & David Manley - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Descriptions.Stephen Neale - 1990 - MIT Press.
Descriptions.S. Neale - 1996 - Critica 28 (83):97-129.

View all 10 references / Add more references